Saturday, 29 August 2009

Celebrating Multi-Culturalism!

Part 1 : The Notting Hill Carnival : 30 - 31st August 2009

I took the above photograph, in 2000, my first visit to the much hyped Notting Hill Carnival in West London. The official street festival originally began in 1966 by Caribbean immigrants based on the Trinidad Carnival and annually, it attracts hundreds of thousands of visitors from all over the world, and today, the Notting Hill Carnival is the second largest street festival in the world, only being surpassed by the Rio Carnival in Brazil.

According to wikipedia :

Carnival began in January 1959 in St Pancras Town Hall as a response to the depressing state of race relations at the time; the UK's first widespread racial attacks (the Notting Hill race riots) had occurred the previous year.

The carnival was a huge success, despite being held indoors. It first moved outside and was rescheduled to August in 1965. The prime movers were Rhaune Laslett, who was not aware of the indoor events when she first raised the idea, and Claudia Jones, a "Trini", who is widely recognised as 'the Mother of Notting Hill Carnival'. At this point, it was more a Notting Hill event than an African-Caribbean event, and only around a thousand people attended.

The rest they say, is history.

Today, the Carnival represents UK's and in particular, London's diverse and multi-cultural population and heritage, extending the street festival to include other ethnic cultures, like Latina, Asian, European and Indian traditions. Apart from celebrating black afro-carribean dance and music, there will be samba, reggae, soca and all the other derivative styles, not forgetting the wide variety of ethnic food on sale in stalls that jam-pack the side streets of the processions. The majority of stalls will be selling BBQ jerk chicken, but expect Filipino, Spanish, Thai and even Malaysian street food. Such is the mix that is in the Carnival, that over 1 million visitors can be expected over this bank holiday weekend, and the weather's been promised fine.

This weekend also see Malaysia celebrating 52 years of Nationhood.

I know what I'll be doing this weekend!

Friday, 14 August 2009


I have been meaning to write a piece on photography and how I see it as affecting my life and vision, what photography means to me. Well, I hope this is a start of many more essays I intend to write. Blogs are a great medium to disseminate thought and receive instant feedback, so please feel free to respond, I would love to hear from you, readers.


The Sun Never Sets : Avoiding cliches in Photography

We all do it.

Look through your archive of images over the years and you can surely find many cliche photographs. Defining 'cliche' is perhaps just as important as knowing how to identify these images. Cliche means something that has a common banality, overdone, overstretched, trite and unoriginal. In photography, I am just as guilty as the next person in photographing cliche images.

Photographs like sunsets or sunrise (depending on your personal disposition), waterfalls with extra blurry water, HDR of all varieties, cute babies, even cuter cats and dogs with that 'aww' expression, super sharp macro images of a butterfly perched on a flower with great background 'bokeh', the ubiquitous portrait of a squating ethnic street trader shot from across the street, a three-quarter posing smiling rickshaw driver, a typical Buddhist monk walking to temple in a saffron robe, a smiling Balinese girl in ritual dress balancing a basket of floral offerings on her head, or a wannabe skinny model posing in a bikini with that 'come hither' look in a shopping mall.

We continue to shoot these images for fear of venturing outside the photographic 'comfort zone' that we are so accustomed to because of the apathy of trying.

If you look through your viewfinder and see something familiar, move on, I'd say, its already been done. Only by recognising the unfamiliar, can you then explore its possibilities in fresh compositions and new angles.

That is not to say we cannot learn to see visually by studying images of others. Plagiarism is the greatest form of flattery. Armed with a greater visual acuity in observational skills, a thinking photographer can re-invent the wheel, if needs be, to adopt a new style through the assimilation, transformation and reformulation of ideas. Photography is after all a personal artistic expression of one's visual cortex of what reality is. The camera is only a tool that achieves this expression.

Resist, resist, resist!

By resisting your attempts at photographing cliche, you will begin to look out for the unusual and extraordinary. Photographers willing to seriously step up and out of the mediocrity may need to re-invent themselves, and become artists, as opposed to mere operators. Yasmin Ahmad, who sadly passed away a few weeks ago, mentioned in a TV interview that "there are no creative people, but only good observers". To become artists, I feel that we need to be good observers first.

Observation will lead one to story-telling, and this is where the basis of documentary and journalistic photography takes form. Film-makers are terribly good observers of space and light in the 3-dimensions. Stills photographers can greatly learn from their counterparts how to see through a scene, that is, anticipation of what comes before and after the moment. By looking fluidly through a scene like a movie, the 'decisive moment' (coined by Cartier-Bresson) can be determined in an instance, where eye, mind and camera is working as one in tandem.

To continue photographing cliche imagery is akin to perfecting the perfect. No matter how many attempts in photographing the Eiffel Tower, one can do no better than the picture perfect postcards that depict the structure being sold at the tourist shops. If you are after the perfect image, go buy a postcard.

The Beholder's Eye : Interpreting Photographs

© Minnie Mouse and Eiffel, Paris 2002

I photographed the image above at the Trocadero in Paris. It was later when I had printed the image then I begin to deconstruct the photograph to its main elements.

The context was that Disneyland Paris was going through a financial bad patch and the French initially saw it's construction as an invasion of Americanism, a 'cultural imperialism' of consumerism. It is as if Monsieur Gustav Eiffel was giving the 'one finger salute' to the Yanks, being represented here as a Minnie Mouse cap-toting child, pretending to be an adult, pushing a pram, with all the insecurities and uncertainties she faces in the future. The whimsical line drawing of the flower on the hoarding adds a humorous twist to the photograph.

I remember actually feeling a bit disappointed as I got to the Trocadero that morning, to see a huge perimeter hoarding around the site, totally obliterating the view of the Eiffel Tower that day due to the renovation project that was going on.

Of course, I had not 'seen' all these elements in the viewfinder at the time of exposure. It was actually a grab shot. The child's parents were probably only steps ahead to the right of the frame. But because I noticed the Minnie Mouse cap first, and thought it had a potential story, I only then framed the child with the hoarding and stepped back a few feet to include the tower in the background. The flower graffiti was purely coincidental.

Approach is everything.

Poetry In Photographs

Why do we make photographs? To answer this question is to understand, not necessarily the process, but social art history. Why do people climb mountains? Because we can.

Similarly, with the invention of the camera lucida, artists were able to draw and thus, paint images with a remarkable likeness to the scene they see, and since the invention of the negative plate and early cameras, creating images and portraits were not only confined to the upper classes and noblemen through commissioning painters. Photography became accessible to the greater public. Men have always been fascinated by the facsimile image of themselves, at work, at play, in social gatherings, and with their families. A photograph records a moment in time, and hence it is immortal, in a skewed sense of the word. It narrows distance, and is nostalgic.

© Under the Eiffel Tower, 2001

Why do we photograph? Because we can. In today's throwaway society, we encounter an overkill of images in our daily lives, both in print and electronically. Man have always been image-led. The popularity and growth in digital photography has enabled everyone to make technically decent photographs with little or no knowledge of the processes. Such are the advancements in science, that accessibility to cameras is practically a given. What is lacking however, is the ability to produce meaningful art imagery, where the poetry of a photograph can be read, like a Haiku.

© Iban fighting cock, Sarawak 2009

Creating a meaningful series of photographs to depict a story can be compared to writing poetry. Writer's block therefore is not uncommon when I photograph. There are good days and bad. Mostly bad as statistically proven. Ansel Adams wrote that he was happy if he could photograph 12 'keepers' a year or so. That may be true for him, working with 10'' x 8'' negatives. Today, a fine art photographer must produce a higher rate of 'keepers' just to keep up with his peers, and competition is rife. There are as many different workflows as there are fine art photographers, so I have surmised that there isn't a right or wrong way, just your way or my way of working.

I prefer working in series, often medium term so as to give ample time for research, execution, fine-tuning and developing the project. Like poetry, my images must first be able to withstand scrutiny, conform to a 'system' of visual cues and can be identifiable as my work.

Next instalment :

Part II : Visual Signature

Tuesday, 11 August 2009

Photographic Practice : The Print Principle

I have been lazy. I have not printed a decent image for over 18 months, yes, that's one and a half years (!) Don't get me wrong, I have taken lots of photographs in that period, but I admit, I have not properly printed a proof or exhibition print till today. What a revival feeling it brought!

3 years ago, I purchased a used Epson R1800 photo printer from Michael Freeman, and boy it was a brilliant machine, capable of printing 13" x 19" prints with archival colour inks. It sits sadly on one side of my study, untouched for that long, whilst I happily churned away with mediocre stuff on my HP all-in-one desktop printer, that's even got wireless connectivity.

This afternoon, for fear of clogged print heads damaging the Epson, I took myself to task of resurrecting 'the machine' and ran a sample A4 word document through it. It sort of made all the correct noises, beeping and clicking like a bleeding R2D2, and finally the paper was spewed out at the front...nothing...just very feint lines of blue, red and black spots..arrgh! Nevertheless, I persevered and ran two, no three cleaning cycles on it, before it produced a perfect test print. That took over 30 minutes.

I still have 3 boxes of A3 matt-heavyweight paper stacked under my desk, so I decided to make proof prints of some of my photographs from my current 'on-going' (yea, for 4 years) project titled LUMINA ( watch out for it, its a stunner, he says).

Well., the boy's pleased. I'm a happy bunny and all that.

Colours were slightly off, needs tweaking, but who cares, for now. I remembered Ralph Gibson saying in a workshop with him in 2002 that he often makes rough prints of his works and sticks them on his wall, and everyday, he would stare at them, until he gets bored, trying to understand each image, as he makes some more. Perhaps I'll make a point of doing just that. Images that dwell in hard drives and memory cards are next to useless. You make them and forget about them. I have tons of these, and only revert to good memory to pick them out, despite a fairly efficient filing system I have developed.

The other thing to note is this.

Camera manufacturers are constantly shoving up our noses with higher megapixel counts, 5 million, 7 million, 10 million, 13 million, 21 million, 24 million,..and, like suckers, we consumers only know one thing, the bigger, higher, more..the better and we are slurping these machines up like there's no tomorrow. Yes, big is good, for commercial photographers who print posters.

When was the last time you made a large print?

I mean, large, not 5" x 7" or 8" x 10". No, not A4 or A3 even. Earlier this year, I selected 4 of my black and white architectural studies taken in a French monastery last year to be enlarged to about 1 m x 1.5 m, something like 3 feet x 5 feet to grace a showroom wall in KL. The resolution was stunning at that size and the original files came from a 5-million pixel camera. At first, I had reservations about going that large but after some initial patch testing, I thought it would hold up, and it certainly did. I hope the ID guy was pleased.

A good 8 - 10 MP DSLR would be sufficient to produce a typical magazine spread ie. A3 size, and depending on the quality of lens resolution you have, you can go larger. I did say DSLR, and not compact digitals of equivalent MP count. These are just not in the same league due to technical constraints of sensors but I won't go into all that.

So, my take is this. If all you are ever going to do are 5"x 7"s and the occasional A4 or A3 prints, you could save a packet by looking out for older DSLRs, from 2 or 3 years ago, around 6 - 8 MPs, and smile!